Politically exposed persons (PEPs) are high risk clients according to the international anti-money laundering standards. Search online for PEPs, their close associates and affiliated entities.
A politically exposed person (PEP) is someone who's been appointed by a community institution, an international body or a state, including the UK, to a high-profile position within the last 12 months.
Under anti-money laundering regulations, the main aim of applying additional scrutiny to work involving PEPs is to mitigate the risk that the proceeds of bribery and corruption may be laundered, or assets otherwise stripped from their country of origin.
PEPs can be:
PEPs also include:
You should take a risk-based and proportionate approach to identifying whether you have a PEP as a client.
Situations which might suggest you have a PEP client include:
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) expects firms to use information that’s reasonably available to them to help identify PEPs, including:
You do not have to actively investigate whether beneficial owners of a client are PEPs. However, if you know that a beneficial owner is a PEP, you should consider what extra measures, if any, you need to take when dealing with that client.
E-verification providers and internet sources can often provide information about individuals and:
They can also show whether there are any credible allegations of, or investigations into, criminal activity which you should consider when assessing risk.
If your client is a PEP, you should apply enhanced due diligence measures. You should also treat business with PEPs on a case-by-case basis.
Under regulation 35 of the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017, (MLR 2017) if your client is a PEP you must:
It’s also recommended that you tell those responsible for monitoring risk assessments in your firm that a business relationship with a PEP has begun.
Once you establish that you have a PEP client, you can look at the basis on which they're categorised (lower or higher risk) and the nature of the retainer they’re asking you to undertake. This will help you make sure that your enhanced due diligence is proportionate and effective.
Asking basic questions and documenting the responses may adequately mitigate the increased risk of money laundering if:
You may need to ask further questions and gather more documentary evidence if the:
Regulation 33(6) of the MLR 2017 indicates some transactions which may be high risk, especially where a PEP is involved.
Higher risk PEPs may still pose some risk after they leave office. Because of this, you may choose to do enhanced due diligence for longer.
A risk-based approach only relates to how many questions you ask. You should ask as many as you need to be comfortable that the retainer is consistent with the legitimate funds available to the PEP and that you do not suspect money laundering.
If you know or suspect a money laundering offence is taking place, you must make a disclosure to your firm’s money laundering reporting officer (MLRO).
If you’re the MLRO and you know or suspect a money laundering offence is taking place, you must submit a suspicious activity report (SAR) to the National Crime Agency.
The Legal Sector Affinity Group’s Anti-money laundering guidance for the legal sector – Treasury-approved official guidance
FCA guidance on The treatment of politically exposed persons for anti-money laundering purposes